Promoting the high-quality development of urban and rural integration in the new development stage is an inevitable requirement to address the imbalance and insufficiency of urban and rural development, and a key path to urban modernization and rural agricultural modernization. Collaborative governance provides a scientific perspective for the study of urban and rural integrated development. The research shows that the development of urban and rural integration follows the internal logic of power coordination, goal coordination, main body coordination and factor coordination, which is conducive to promoting the high-quality development of urban and rural integration. Although the urban-rural integration development has achieved relatively remarkable results, there are still realistic difficulties such as the core leading ability of grassroots party organizations to be continuously enhanced, the scale agglomeration effect of rural characteristic industries is not obvious, the synergy of multiple subjects has not yet formed, and the allocation of urban and rural digital factor resources is not reasonable. Based on this, the optimization path of urban-rural integration development from the perspective of collaborative governance is concluded: That is, we will continue to strengthen the core leading ability of grassroots party organizations, innovate to drive the high-quality development of rural characteristic industries, extensively gather the synergy of multiple subjects, and digitally empower the rational allocation of urban and rural factor resources.
Published in | Science Innovation (Volume 11, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.si.20231106.17 |
Page(s) | 266-272 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Collaborative Governance, Urban and Rural Integration, Grassroots Party Organizations, Rural Industry Development
[1] | 中国共产党第十九届中央委员会第五次全体会议公报. |
[2] | 龙花楼, 徐雨利, 郑瑜晗, 陈坤秋. 中国式现代化下的县域城乡融合发展 [J]. 经济地理, 2023, 43 (07): 12-19. |
[3] | 陈磊, 姜海; 田双清. 县域城乡融合发展与农村土地制度改革: 理论逻辑与实现路径 [J]. 中国土地学, 2022, 36 (09): 20-28. |
[4] | 孙绍勇. 新时代全面推进城乡融合发展的共同富裕逻辑旨要 [J]. 福建论坛 (人文社会科学版), 2023 (03): 5-16. |
[5] | 夏安玲. 城乡融合视域下昆明新型城镇化与乡村振兴协同发展研究 [J]. 农机市场, 2023, (09): 70-72. |
[6] | 苏明敏; 李妍; 李玲. 乡村振兴背景下推进以人为核心的新型城镇化建设研究 [J]. 南方农机, 2022, 53 (18): 124-126. |
[7] | 俞鹏. 新时代农村基层党建引领乡村振兴研究 [C]. 南京师范大学, 2021. |
[8] | 习近平. 习近平谈治国理政: 第4卷 [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2022: 501. |
[9] | 习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告 [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2022: 31-67. |
[10] | 本报评论员. 深入推进城乡融合发展 加快促进共同富裕 [N]. 承德报, 2022-11-25. 001. |
[11] | 习近平. 论把握新发展阶段、贯彻新发展理念、构建新发展格局 [M]. 北京: 中央文献出版社, 2021. |
[12] | 杨敏; 李明德. 多元主体协同推进基层社会治理探论 [J]. 理论导刊, 2022, (11): 89-94. |
[13] | 刘芳娜. 城乡融合发展的路径选择——从资源配置的视角 [J]. 韶关学院学报, 2022, 43 (10): 99-103. |
[14] | 西宁市湟源县人民政府, 湟源概况. [EB/OL]. http: //www. huangyuan. gov. cn/index. |
[15] | 张艳玲. 数字乡村背景下城乡信息融合对流通业一体化发展的影响 [J]. 商业经济研究, 2022 (13): 175-178. |
[16] | 郭景福, 黄江. 乡村振兴视阈下民族地区构建现代乡村产业体系的机制与路径探析 [J]. 云南民族大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2022, 39 (03): 110-117. |
APA Style
Chunhe, M., Shuang, L., Yuying, M., Lijun, H. (2023). The Innovation Path of Urban-Rural Integration Development from the Perspective of Collaborative Governance: A Case Study of H County in Q Province. Science Innovation, 11(6), 266-272. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20231106.17
ACS Style
Chunhe, M.; Shuang, L.; Yuying, M.; Lijun, H. The Innovation Path of Urban-Rural Integration Development from the Perspective of Collaborative Governance: A Case Study of H County in Q Province. Sci. Innov. 2023, 11(6), 266-272. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20231106.17
AMA Style
Chunhe M, Shuang L, Yuying M, Lijun H. The Innovation Path of Urban-Rural Integration Development from the Perspective of Collaborative Governance: A Case Study of H County in Q Province. Sci Innov. 2023;11(6):266-272. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20231106.17
@article{10.11648/j.si.20231106.17, author = {Mao Chunhe and Liang Shuang and Mao Yuying and Hou Lijun}, title = {The Innovation Path of Urban-Rural Integration Development from the Perspective of Collaborative Governance: A Case Study of H County in Q Province}, journal = {Science Innovation}, volume = {11}, number = {6}, pages = {266-272}, doi = {10.11648/j.si.20231106.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20231106.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20231106.17}, abstract = {Promoting the high-quality development of urban and rural integration in the new development stage is an inevitable requirement to address the imbalance and insufficiency of urban and rural development, and a key path to urban modernization and rural agricultural modernization. Collaborative governance provides a scientific perspective for the study of urban and rural integrated development. The research shows that the development of urban and rural integration follows the internal logic of power coordination, goal coordination, main body coordination and factor coordination, which is conducive to promoting the high-quality development of urban and rural integration. Although the urban-rural integration development has achieved relatively remarkable results, there are still realistic difficulties such as the core leading ability of grassroots party organizations to be continuously enhanced, the scale agglomeration effect of rural characteristic industries is not obvious, the synergy of multiple subjects has not yet formed, and the allocation of urban and rural digital factor resources is not reasonable. Based on this, the optimization path of urban-rural integration development from the perspective of collaborative governance is concluded: That is, we will continue to strengthen the core leading ability of grassroots party organizations, innovate to drive the high-quality development of rural characteristic industries, extensively gather the synergy of multiple subjects, and digitally empower the rational allocation of urban and rural factor resources. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Innovation Path of Urban-Rural Integration Development from the Perspective of Collaborative Governance: A Case Study of H County in Q Province AU - Mao Chunhe AU - Liang Shuang AU - Mao Yuying AU - Hou Lijun Y1 - 2023/11/29 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20231106.17 DO - 10.11648/j.si.20231106.17 T2 - Science Innovation JF - Science Innovation JO - Science Innovation SP - 266 EP - 272 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-787X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20231106.17 AB - Promoting the high-quality development of urban and rural integration in the new development stage is an inevitable requirement to address the imbalance and insufficiency of urban and rural development, and a key path to urban modernization and rural agricultural modernization. Collaborative governance provides a scientific perspective for the study of urban and rural integrated development. The research shows that the development of urban and rural integration follows the internal logic of power coordination, goal coordination, main body coordination and factor coordination, which is conducive to promoting the high-quality development of urban and rural integration. Although the urban-rural integration development has achieved relatively remarkable results, there are still realistic difficulties such as the core leading ability of grassroots party organizations to be continuously enhanced, the scale agglomeration effect of rural characteristic industries is not obvious, the synergy of multiple subjects has not yet formed, and the allocation of urban and rural digital factor resources is not reasonable. Based on this, the optimization path of urban-rural integration development from the perspective of collaborative governance is concluded: That is, we will continue to strengthen the core leading ability of grassroots party organizations, innovate to drive the high-quality development of rural characteristic industries, extensively gather the synergy of multiple subjects, and digitally empower the rational allocation of urban and rural factor resources. VL - 11 IS - 6 ER -