In recent years, with the deepening of brain science research, mouse magnetic resonance microscopy (MRM) for neuroimaging research has gradually become a main research interest. Brain segmentation is an essential techniques for investigating the brain morphometry, while the traditional approach to segment a given brain involves the manual delineation of the ROIs by an expert. This practice can be slow and unscalable. Although automatic atlas-based segmentation approaches have been developed and validated for the human brain MRI, there is limited work for the mouse brain MRM. This paper combined optimized image registration and multi-atlas model for mouse brain segmentation. The results showed that multiple atlases with optimized geodesic-SyN can best improve the segmentation accuracy in the mouse brain, and registration algorithm plays important role in performance improvement.
Published in | Science Discovery (Volume 5, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sd.20170506.26 |
Page(s) | 486-491 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Mouse, Magnetic Resource Microscopy, Brain Segmentation
[1] | L. Lin, Z. Fu, X. Xu, and S. Wu, “Mouse brain magnetic resonance microscopy: Applications in Alzheimer disease,”J. Microscopy Research & Technique, 78(5)2015, pp. 416-424. |
[2] | S. E. Wang, and C. H. Wu, “Physiological and Histological Evaluations of the Cochlea between 3xTg-AD Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Diseases and R6/2 Mouse Model of Huntington's Diseases,” J. Chinese Journal of Physiology, 58(6), 2015, pp. 359. |
[3] | M. Verma, D. Beaulieu-Abdelahad, G. Ait-Ghezala, R. Li, F. Crawford, M. Mullan, and D. Paris, “Chronic Anatabine Treatment Reduces Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)-Like Pathology and Improves Socio-Behavioral Deficits in a Transgenic Mouse Model of AD,” J. PLOS ONE, 2015, pp. 10. |
[4] | M. Venissa, Z. Tanja, A. Abdelraheim, and S. Björn “Microglia-Mediated Neuroinflammation and Neurotrophic Factor-Induced Protection in the MPTP Mouse Model of Parkinson’s Disease-Lessons from Transgenic Mice,” J. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(2), 2016, pp. 151. |
[5] | 林岚,付振荣,张柏雯,等.PS/APP双转基因小鼠大脑中β-淀粉样蛋白的磁共振显微成像和组织切片研究[J].中国医疗设备,2016,31(2):31-33。 |
[6] | H. BENVENISTE, and S. BLACKBAND, “MR microscopy and highresolution small animal MRI: Applications in neuroscienceresearch,” J. Prog Neurobiol, 67(5), 2002, pp. 393-420. |
[7] | B. DRIEHUYS, J. NOULS, A. BADEA, E. Bucholz, K. Ghaghada, A. Petiet, and L. W. Hedlund, “Small animal imaging withmagnetic resonance microscopy,” J. ILAR J, 49(1), 2008, pp. 35-53. |
[8] | B. B. Avants, C. L. Epstein, M Grossman, and J. C. Gee, “Symmetric Diffeomorphic Image Registration with Cross-Correlation: Evaluating Automated Labeling of Elderly and Neurodegenerative Brain,” J. Medical Image Analysis, 12(1), 2008, pp. 26-41. |
[9] | B. B. Avants,N. J. Tustison, G. Song, P. A. Cook,A. Klein, and J. C. Gee, “A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration,”J. Neuroimage, 54(3), 2011, pp. 2033-2044. |
[10] | Z. Fu, L. Lin, M. Tian, J. Wang, B. Zhang, P. Chu, S. Li, M. M. Pathan, Y. Deng, and S. Wu,“Evaluation of five diffeomorphic image registration algorithms for mouse brain magnetic resonance microscopy,” J. Microsc,268(2),2017, pp. 141-154. |
[11] | 付振荣,林岚,张柏雯,等.基于MRM的小鼠脑模板创建的研究进展[J].中国医疗设备,2016, 31(2): 25-30。 |
[12] | A. Gholipour, A. Akhondiasl, J. A. Estroff and S. K. Warfield, “Multi-atlas multi-shape segmentation of fetal brain MRI for volumetric and morphometric analysis of ventriculomegaly,”J. Neuroimage, 2012 15; 60(3): 1819-31. |
[13] | J. E. Iglesias and M. R. Sabuncu,“Multi-atlas segmentation of biomedical images: A survey,”J. Med Image Anal,24(1), pp. 205-219, Aug 2015. |
[14] | L. Lin, S. Wu, G. Bin, and C. Yang,“Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Using N3 on Mouse Brain,”J. Magnetic Resonance Microscopy [J]. Journal of Neuroimaging Official Journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging, 23(4),2013, pp. 502-507. |
[15] | J. G. Sled, A. P. Zijdenbos, and A. C. Evans, “A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data,” J. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 17(1), 1998, pp. 87-97. |
[16] | K. B. J. Franklin, G. Paxinos, The Mouse Brain: In Stereotaxic Coordinates, 1st ed., New York: Academic Press, 2001. |
APA Style
Lin Lan, Wang Jingxuan, Fu Zhenrong, Wu Xuetao, Gu Kenan, et al. (2017). Multi-Atlas Segmentation of Mouse Brain MRM Based on Optimized Advanced Normalization Tools. Science Discovery, 5(6), 486-491. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170506.26
ACS Style
Lin Lan; Wang Jingxuan; Fu Zhenrong; Wu Xuetao; Gu Kenan, et al. Multi-Atlas Segmentation of Mouse Brain MRM Based on Optimized Advanced Normalization Tools. Sci. Discov. 2017, 5(6), 486-491. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20170506.26
AMA Style
Lin Lan, Wang Jingxuan, Fu Zhenrong, Wu Xuetao, Gu Kenan, et al. Multi-Atlas Segmentation of Mouse Brain MRM Based on Optimized Advanced Normalization Tools. Sci Discov. 2017;5(6):486-491. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20170506.26
@article{10.11648/j.sd.20170506.26, author = {Lin Lan and Wang Jingxuan and Fu Zhenrong and Wu Xuetao and Gu Kenan and Wu Shuicai}, title = {Multi-Atlas Segmentation of Mouse Brain MRM Based on Optimized Advanced Normalization Tools}, journal = {Science Discovery}, volume = {5}, number = {6}, pages = {486-491}, doi = {10.11648/j.sd.20170506.26}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170506.26}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sd.20170506.26}, abstract = {In recent years, with the deepening of brain science research, mouse magnetic resonance microscopy (MRM) for neuroimaging research has gradually become a main research interest. Brain segmentation is an essential techniques for investigating the brain morphometry, while the traditional approach to segment a given brain involves the manual delineation of the ROIs by an expert. This practice can be slow and unscalable. Although automatic atlas-based segmentation approaches have been developed and validated for the human brain MRI, there is limited work for the mouse brain MRM. This paper combined optimized image registration and multi-atlas model for mouse brain segmentation. The results showed that multiple atlases with optimized geodesic-SyN can best improve the segmentation accuracy in the mouse brain, and registration algorithm plays important role in performance improvement.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Multi-Atlas Segmentation of Mouse Brain MRM Based on Optimized Advanced Normalization Tools AU - Lin Lan AU - Wang Jingxuan AU - Fu Zhenrong AU - Wu Xuetao AU - Gu Kenan AU - Wu Shuicai Y1 - 2017/12/28 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170506.26 DO - 10.11648/j.sd.20170506.26 T2 - Science Discovery JF - Science Discovery JO - Science Discovery SP - 486 EP - 491 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0650 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170506.26 AB - In recent years, with the deepening of brain science research, mouse magnetic resonance microscopy (MRM) for neuroimaging research has gradually become a main research interest. Brain segmentation is an essential techniques for investigating the brain morphometry, while the traditional approach to segment a given brain involves the manual delineation of the ROIs by an expert. This practice can be slow and unscalable. Although automatic atlas-based segmentation approaches have been developed and validated for the human brain MRI, there is limited work for the mouse brain MRM. This paper combined optimized image registration and multi-atlas model for mouse brain segmentation. The results showed that multiple atlases with optimized geodesic-SyN can best improve the segmentation accuracy in the mouse brain, and registration algorithm plays important role in performance improvement. VL - 5 IS - 6 ER -